This has been of enormous value to India since it means that educated classes and many others from different ends of the country, and different cultural backgrounds can talk to each other. Advocates of empires also drew upon a tradition of westward expansion over the course of the previous century. According to document one Britain as the colonizer gained many natural resources from India. In the earth 19th century, the British encouraged agriculture, which decreased nomads and pastors. Indian hand-made textiles could not compete with the cheap machine-made textiles. India, once they were educated and finally taken the last straw of mistreatment, wanted freedom.
This was a religious concern for Hindu and Muslim sepoys who were forbidden to eat these meats. Like children, the American colonies grew and flourished under British supervision. Moreover, the European rulers oftenfavored members of minority tribes to help them govern thecountries, which, after independence, led to tribal tensions andbloodshed when other tribes also wanted a share of power: think ofthe Hutu-Tutsi struggles in Rwanda or the tensions between theKikuyu and other tribes in Kenya. There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. Economic depression led some U. Their cities were more modernized, and they were introduced to the European water system, etc. When they had conquered India in 1858, India was not subjected to the influences of the western world, except for trade with the Greeks.
Britain unenthusiastically became involved in Africa for numerous reasons, mostly to serve their own interests. Many Indians who worked with British officials for administrative purposes were portrayed as disloyal or deceitful to their Indian brethren by the British. British colonial technologies has nothing to do in it. India has been under the imperialist control of the British until their independence in 1947. The question, then, is, does the good outweigh the bad? Since its discovery, Europeans were trying get a piece of India's action. An awesome example of this is the United States.
Britain was just a tool for Hindus in India to expel Muslim Mughal empire. In 1858 Charles Wood Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, the famous Bengali writer became one of the first two graduates of Calcutta University. Besides highlighting the fact that without cheap labor and raw materials from India, the modernization of Britain during this era would have been highly unlikely, I will show how colonial… 2258 Words 10 Pages Historical Context and Background British involvement on the Indian subcontinent began early in the 17th Century through the British East India Company and its business ventures and dealings. Britain soon crushed the rebellion and killed and tortured many of the Sepoy's. When the colonizers imported food, the demand of cash crops increased. They were made to serve even the British dogs. Garbage collectors and business men — all came together to form a team and rid the country of outsiders.
Christian Indians say that Britain united a disparate country, Moslem Indians say Britain stopped them taking over the whole of Africa and South Asia. In many cases England was the imperial, or mother country. Comparing present day countries that were formerly part of the British Empire with those that used to be ruled by Spain, Portugal, France, or Italy, it does appear that in most instances, the legacy of the British has been better, or at least not as bad, as that of other European imperial powers. Back toWikipedia The arrival of the British East India Company and the imposition ofcrown rule following the Indian Rebellion in 1857 along with theinfluence of the British anti-slavery society of WilliamWilberforce eventually brought slavery and the slave markets to anend in India. I will also be using my further knowledge… 5664 Words 23 Pages Motives for British Imperialism in Africa Before the Europeans began the New Imperialism in Africa, very little was known about the inner parts of the continent.
English thus united the educated Indians and brought about a feeling of oneness among them. Beginning around 1707, however, the dynasty collapsed into dozens of small states. A half-anna postage stamp would carry a letter from one part of the country to another. It's also very possible that the legacy of colonialism -- whether positive or negative -- manifests differently in national rather than local governance. In the late 18th century, the British East India Company traded in and partially controlled India.
It was, however, only the Philippines that remained, for three decades, as a colonial possession. Joint Anglo-French financial control over Egypt ended in outright British occupation in 1882. They conquered Korea in the early 20th century and thenin the 1930's invaded China. To add insult to injury, the colonisers saw themselves as superior to those they colonised. Wars with Britain, and against leaders started by Great Britain, took away a lot of money. These are the fundamental gains for the development of Indian nationalism.
When the Mughal invader Babur came down from Kabul in 1525, he first defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the battle of Panipat and then the Rajput King, Babur, took over a substantial part of northern India. The improvement in communications eventually helped to foster a sense of unity among Indians. As the Industrial Revolution gained momentum, the manufacturing class became very powerful in England. India and British were involved in barter trade over a long period of time. Under this system, the zamindar or the revenue collector of an estate became the permanent holder of the land. Colonization, in which the colonizer introduces new ideas to the native people, results in a culture being nearly wiped from the face of earth. People from different religions and social backgrounds, while travelling in a railway compartment, mingled with one another thereby challenging the age- old orthodox notions of untouchability, caste- based eating habits etc.
And just as Germany reacted to depression with the adoption of tariff protection in 1879 and colonial expansion in 1884-85, so would the U. Whatever the causes, the result of the war was that the U. Imperialism will destroy the planet if it is not replaced with democratic governments composed of working people and farmers. These achievements have also created healthy competition among other countries as they strive to follow in the U. Britain already being a world power, lead the charge of industry throughout the world, using their far superior technology at the time to imperialize and colonize almost any nation that would benefit them.
According to Global Issues Journal 2011 , India is one of the biggest recipients of long-term foreign aid in the world and mainly supported by donors, such as the United States of America and the United Kingdom, and international organizations,… 1679 Words 7 Pages History Russell McGillivray Kenya The British colonization of Kenya destroyed the culture and economy of the native people, but it established a democratic government and left Kenya a more modernized country. It depends on whether you want to take the risk. The defeat of Tipu Sultan by the British was aresult of him taking anti-British side in a larger struggle - notfor independence, but between the French and the British over whowas going to be top dog in India. By 1757, the army of the British East India Company along with the French allies had also beaten the Nawab of Bengal at the Battle of Plassey. Impact in the area of transport and communication : The East India Company was primarily a trading concern. William Jones founded the Asiatic Society.