Can you suggest some examples that the author might want to include in his or her revision? Researching the Critique The questions listed under many of the subheadings in this section may provide you with a good place to begin understanding what you are looking for and what form your critique might take. Methodology If the manuscript you are reviewing is reporting an experiment, check the methods section first. Plotnick, the boys' landlord and owner of the Olympiad Delicatessen, is one of the greediest and most annoying people you'll ever meet in a book, and the boys spend a lot of their time trying to find ways to get even with him. Approach B Another common way to structure a journal article critique is the following: Introduction In the introduction, cite the journal article in full and provide a summary of the journal article. Writing a summary and review essay of an article strengthens a reader's critical thinking skills.
Facts can be verified, while opinions arise from interpretations of facts. I also consider the journal. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. With a book, you can look at the plot, the characters, and the way that the author puts words together. Tanya Golash-Boza is Associate Professor of Sociology and American Studies at the University of Kansas. Finally, I am more inclined to review for journals with double-blind reviewing practices and journals that are run by academic societies, because those are both things that I want to support and encourage. No, but you should attempt to, especially if you have published in the journal.
What were the techniques used? I almost never print out papers for review; I prefer to work with the electronic version. Although it is difficult to be completely objective when assessing a paper that may not coincide with one's own beliefs or values, nevertheless, a reviewer must always strive for that goal. At some point in your scholarly career, you likely will get asked to review an article for a journal. Are the methods robust and well controlled? And now I am in the happy situation of only experiencing late-review guilt on Friday afternoons, when I still have some time ahead of me to complete the week's review. This will help you spot grammar mistakes and see any flaws in organization. This recommendation is appropriate for papers that have major problems. Specifically: Do they integrate their findings with the research literature they presented earlier in their article--do they bring the findings back to the previous literature reviewed? Conclusion In this section, sum up the strengths and weaknesses of the research as a whole.
Do not be swayed by personal thoughts. However, development anthropology, which is often equated with applied anthropology, usually focuses on the community level. . Reading the Article: Points to Consider Read the article carefully. An emphasis of the significance of the work, conclusions, and recommendations. When you read the first time, just read for the big picture — that is, look for the overall argument and point the article is making.
Periodical Title, Volume Issue , pp. If the authors have presented a new tool or software, I will test it in detail. Please ensure that comments are detailed and clear and that they are constructive in nature, even if you are recommending that the paper be rejected. I usually differentiate between major and minor criticisms and word them as directly and concisely as possible. You should review articles because it is part of the culture of research that we all contribute to this essential service.
In a systematic review with a focused question, the research methods must be clearly described. It will help you make the right decision. Your comments should be courteous and constructive, and should not include any ad hominem remarks or personal details including your name unless the journal you are invited to review for employs. Authors need to know what they have done well and not just what they have done poorly. For instance, the research addresses a vital topic, but is not presented in a logical or lucid fashion, or questions may exist about some aspects of its method. It will help to pinpoint all 3-5 articles. It identifies both strengths and weaknesses, and offers concrete suggestions for improvements.
Besides that, I make notes on an extra sheet. Journal articles vary greatly in subject, style, and methodology, so your review needs to reflect the material you are dealing with. If so, are they understandable? It demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. Instead, you should better stick to the main points of the article. Write the First Draft The review should begin with a complete citation of the article. Rootbeer spends the summer with the boys, taking turns getting the boys into and out of trouble between bouts of Manchurian Bush Meditation and pursuing some of the strangest hobbies in the world.
Do the hypotheses follow logically from previous work? What should you achieve with this article critique. Would there have been a better way to test these hypotheses or to analyze these results? I think a lot of reviewers approach a paper with the philosophy that they are there to identify flaws. I usually sit on the review for a day and then reread it to be sure it is balanced and fair before deciding anything. As I go along, I use a highlighter and other pens, so the manuscript is usually colorful after I read it. What kind of information is produced by using the technique? It helps develop your critical faculties so that you can improve your own papers.
Also write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. For this purpose, avoid mentioning the information that your reader is already familiar with. Providing insight into any deficiencies is important. Could I replicate the results using the information in the Methods and the description of the analysis? Read about concepts in-depth to make sure you understand their full context. Consider them before composing an article review. This process will make your writing process much easier. It can be useful to provide the most important of the specific comments before any minor comments on matters of detail.
How to log in and access your review Your review will be managed via an Elsevier submission system such as. Based in Southern California, A. This allows you to gain a more objective perspective on your ideas. The critical review can be of a book, a chapter, or a journal article. This review is to summarize the essence of the article, its key arguments, and findings, and the author's attitude towards the subject-matter. Respond only to the author's research; do not provide any new research.